NetChoice Seeks Rehearing After 9th Circuit Decision on Addictive Feeds
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals should grant a rehearing en banc in a lawsuit seeking to block a California law that makes it illegal for platforms to provide addictive feeds to minors, NetChoice said in a Tuesday filing (see 2509090049).
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Privacy Daily provides accurate coverage of newsworthy developments in data protection legislation, regulation, litigation, and enforcement for privacy professionals responsible for ensuring effective organizational data privacy compliance.
The three-judge panel that ruled in favor of California violated U.S. Supreme Court and circuit court precedent, holding that “disseminating and accessing websites’ curated personalized feeds are protected by the First Amendment,” the association said in its filing. NetChoice argued the panel incorrectly limited the Supreme Court’s decision in Moody concerning when “feeds are expressive, while providing no workable alternative test for courts to apply.”